Search for: "Dupree v. Dupree"
Results 21 - 40
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
Dupree v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 1:51 pm
Dupree v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:36 am
The post ERNEST DUPREE v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 2:28 pm
Brandon Dupree, Appellant20-10604 United States, et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d at 180; Hashmi… [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am
” In order to establish liability under section 487, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted with intent to deceive him or her or the court (see Gillen v McCarron, 126 AD3d 670, 671 [2015]; Cullin v Spiess, 122 AD3d 792, 793 [2014]; Dupree v Voorhees, 102 AD3d 912, 913 [2013]). [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 11:11 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 5:47 am
Rather, “the only liability standard recognized in Judiciary Law §487 is that of an intent to deceive” (Dupree v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
• William Dale Dupree, 77, of Benbrook, died June 16, 2020. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:45 am
Rather, “the only liability standard recognized in Judiciary Law §487 is that of an intent to deceive” (Dupree v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:33 pm
Fort Peck Tribes (ICWA)Flynn v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 am
The Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487, as the defendants failed to eliminate all triable issues of fact regarding “the only liability standard recognized in Judicary Law § 487 . . . of an intent to deceive” (Dupree v Voorhees, 102 AD3d 912, 913). [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Mack v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:17 pm
DocumentsAlthough the parties' requests referred to documents D9 to D16 of the opposition proceedings (see point V above), only documents D9 and D14 are relevant for the present decision.1.1 Documents D9 and D14 were filed after the nine-months opposition period according to Article 99(1) EPC (impugned decision, points I.4, I.7 and I.9). [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
It must be shown that the alleged deceit “reaches the level of egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior” (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2015] [internal quotation marks and .citation omitted]; but see Dupree v Voorhees, 102 AD3d 912, 913 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Ethel B Branch (Jurisdiction)Pueblo of Isleta v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
Ethel B Branch (Jurisdiction)Pueblo of Isleta v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
Ethel B Branch (Jurisdiction)Pueblo of Isleta v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:22 pm
Keller v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:22 pm
Keller v. [read post]
