Search for: "Dutton v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2018, 12:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
An unprecedented cost award on a summary judgment motion recently in Hughes v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
Dutton and Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd v Ross. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am by Just Security
Williams (@PaulWilliamsDC), Alexandra Koch (@alexandraekoch) and Lilian Waldock The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act and the Dodd Amendment: Shaping United States Engagement with the ICC (Part II) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and Isabelle Glimcher (@IsGlimcher) The Binding Interpretation by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Laws Constraining US Engagement with the ICC (Part III) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and… [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The judgement in Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department QB-2020-002120 was published this week. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
Nonetheless, pursuant to CPLR 2001, the exact label for this motion is less important than the fact that it was necessary to correct a procedural irregularity in a just fashion (Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
State Representative Harold Dutton, Jr. has introduced a bill in the Texas Legislature to amend Texas' Open Beaches Act. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
But how does the state of California define "quarantine? [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:17 am
" Today, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals handed down its opinion in State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]