Search for: "Duvall v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Thorsten Bausch
Here is the beginning of the EPO’s Press Release about this event: The new building for the Boards of Appeal Unit of the EPO in Haar, Munich, was officially inaugurated yesterday. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm
But all public sidewalks near the courthouse are “traditional public fora” (see United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 6:30 am
However, in Capital cases for rape of a woman or child not involving death, execution has been ruled to be unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court through their decisions in Coker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 5:37 am
While well-known in Europe, the Costa line has a low profile in the United States and so shouldn’t impact Carnival, Princess, Norwegian, Celebrity and other major brands sailing domestically. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14]   In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14]   In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
Counsel Sanctioned for Obtaining From Court a “So-Ordered Trial Subpoena Before Trial Date Was Set In Duval v Duval, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 2574001 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the Appellate Division held that Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's motion to impose sanctions upon the plaintiff and her counsel pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm by Lovechilde
  In  2002, United States Supreme Court, in the case of Atkins v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:40 am by PJ Blount
The Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Addington v. [read post]