Search for: "E. B. Jones"
Results 21 - 40
of 901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
” The attorney’s letter of representation is attached hereto as Exhibit B. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Jones, 22-982Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 11:05 am
Jones-Woodin, Roberta S. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 In Webb, the Defendant issued an application for an order that the particulars of claim be struck out in [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
§ 3054(b). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:10 am
Exploring Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Colombia’s Special Sanctions (Sanciones Propias) for International Crimes Helga Malmin Binningsbø, Bård Drange & Cyanne E. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
[Like other features of legal procedure—such as the jury trial, the mechanism for appointing judges, the availability of appeal—pseudonymity both deeply affects the fairness of litigation and, often, the substantive outcomes.] [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
I explained in my Friday post that while step (b) for removal overlaps substantially with the substantive immunity question, step (b) sets a lower threshold. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
Id. at (b). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
In 2022, the Veteran Benefits Administration (“VBA”) paid $120.7 billion to 5.9 million people in compensation benefits. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:24 pm
Appendix E provides detailed insight on designing, adopting, and defending shareholder rights plans. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
At least OSHA appears to have so concluded.[9] Thus, a general requirement of reasonableness, similar to that predominant in tort law with regard to accidental injuries, may be warranted.[10] B. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:51 pm
Jones, 371 N.C. 548 (2018). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: Runaway Juries in Employment Litigation Podcast (Anthony Oncidi) Is L&E Arbitration the Answer? [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
B at 187). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
Aside from its being a petitio principia, we could probably add that the reaction is emotive, uninformed, and uninformative, and that it fails to support the author’s suggestion that “Daubert has it all wrong,” and that “[w]e need a different approach. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
Jones, 22-554Issue: Whether, or in what circumstances, a court may approve a settlement as “fair, reasonable, and adequate” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)(2) when it pays a substantial cy pres award to third parties from the settlement fund. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
