Search for: "E.G. Taylor"
Results 21 - 40
of 665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 6:20 am
See, e.g., Checkers Drive-In Rests., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:34 am
Many thanks to Katfriends at Taylor Wessing (who acted for Hanshow) for providing IPKat with an English translation of the decision. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The pro-Sanofi briefs, in addition to weighing in on the facts of the case (e.g., how many antibodies were in Amgen’s genus, how thorough was Amgen’s disclosure), ar [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
’ The CJEU did agree and has agreed ever since.Yet, the impact of CJEU case law, even after more and consistent CJEU case law tackling the concept of originality, has not always been understood correctly by UK courts, with some judgments suggesting that ‘author’s own intellectual creation’ is an alternative phrase for ‘sufficient skill, labour or effort’ (Temple Island, para 27; Taylor v Maguire, para 8).More recent judgments support however the correct… [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
In addition, different panels of judges of the KSC have held that there is a “need to address the pervasive climate of witness intimidation and interference in Kosovo” (e.g., here at para. 28). [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:13 am
E.g., suppose one subscribes to the norm of inter-nation equity. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:08 am
Few people would lament the site’s demise, but to date it has avoided legal exposure (1, 2) and survived multiple deplatformings (e.g., CloudFlare’s block). [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 1:16 pm
Kind of like yelling “Free Bird” at a Taylor Swift concert or asking a wedding DJ to play the chicken dance. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
During Republican administrations, Democratic members of Congress often lambast presidentially-appointed agency heads for unilaterally curtailing regulations without affording public participation, see e.g. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Let me illustrate my concerns with reference to Taylor Swift, who is, incidentally a fan of very different cats.[2] Recently, I was discussing with my nieces and a friend of theirs, all around thirteen years old, what they would pay to see Taylor Swift in concert. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from professors Taylor A. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 11:48 am
How will the meeting be held (e.g., phone, Zoom)? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
(go back) 2See, e.g. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
(go back) 2See, e.g. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
[2] See, e.g., Advisers Act sections 206 and 204 [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:18 pm
E.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
According to the FDA, “[p]athogenic bacteria (e.g. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:47 am
If you have questions about the PWFA, the EEOC’s proposed regulations, or need assistance with your company’s employee policies or forms, please contact Doug Taylor at (703) 525-4000 or rdougtaylor@beankinney.com, or your current Bean, Kinney & Korman attorney. [read post]
