Search for: "E.I. Dupont De Nemours "
Results 21 - 40
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 7:47 pm
E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Del. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 8:23 pm
DuPont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:35 am
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., D.N.J., No. 06-3080. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:56 pm
The court in E.I. du Pont de Nemours v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:56 pm
The court in E.I. du Pont de Nemours v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:38 am
DuPont de Nemours daily while working as a painter between 1973 and 1996 for Timpte Trailers, a manufacturer of semi-trailers. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:12 pm
E.I. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:24 am
DuPont de Nemours v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:52 pm
Dupont de Nemours & Co., slip op. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:15 am
Under U.S. trademark law and court precedent, determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion involves weighing a number of factors (13 factors to be exact), known as the “Dupont factors,” set out in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
DuPont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:43 am
DuPont de Nemours and Co.v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
The company was sued by DuPont in 2009 after DuPont notified the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 8:34 am
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 2008 WL 4865208 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
DuPont de Nemours and Company to review environmental safety procedures at its industrial plant in Belle, W. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:11 am
DuPont de Nemours and Co., Civ. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Justice announced today a settlement with E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) at its Belle, W. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION, 939 F. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
DuPont De Nemours did not violate the NLRA by unilaterally implementing changes to its company-wide retiree medical and dental plans based on the unions’ waiver of the right to bargain over such changes. [read post]
