Search for: "E.S.2" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The pwc blog has a post on the decision in Shepherd v Information Commissioner [2019] EWCA Crim 2, “Unlawful Disclosure of Personal Data: Who Carries the Burden of Proof Now? [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
On 15 January 2019, in Mătăsaru v. the Republic of Moldova ([2019] ECHR 35) the Court of Human Rights, Second Section unanimously found that an anti-corruption activist’s conviction for staging an “obscene” demonstration outside a prosecutor’s office, targeting a number of public officials, violated the activist’s freedom of expression. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has recently issued a judgment in E.S. v Austria, Application No 38450/12, which might be relevant for the interpretation and application of public policy/morality exclusions, especially in the case of blasphemous and offensive subject matter. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation E.S. v Austria, a highly significant European Court of Human Rights case has been covered by Strasbourg Observers. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
On 2 November 2018 Warby J handed down judgment in the libel case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2395 (QB). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:49 am
However, any such interference would not violate Article 10 ECHR if it isprescribed by law [which was the case here], pursues one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in Article 10(2) ECHR [in this case, the aim would be to protect religious peace], andis “necessary in a democratic society” in order to achieve the aim or aims in question.Censorship? [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
That's part of a broader doctrine under which European countries are still allowed to punish blasphemy.The case, decided yesterday by the European Court of Human Rights, is E.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 6:25 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Prior to a 1990 change, §440.15(2)(b) read, in pertinent part, as follows: … an employee who has sustained the loss of an arm, leg, hand, or foot, or within a reasonable medical certainty the anticipated permanent and total loss of use of such member … shall be paid temporary total disability of 80 percent of his average weekly wage … (e.s.) [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:55 am by Don Cruse
DAVID NELSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A COLLECTIVE CONTRACTING, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP; AND E.E. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court must make provisions for the children in accordance with the Court's view as to what is in their best interest, rather than the adjudication of any disputes between the parents (see Matter of Louise E.S. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
To properly authenticate the printouts, the prosecution had to make two separate showings: (1) the records were those of Facebook and (2) the communications recorded therein were made by [him].People v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:26 pm by Elim
bid=7624247 LAW LIBRARY reference room (level 2): KE507 .P69 2014John E.S. [read post]