Search for: "EC v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2009, 2:42 pm
In its judgment in Case C-369/07 Commission v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:36 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Czop and another: (Joined Cases C-147/11 and C-148/11); [2012] WLR (D) 264 “Article 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community conferred on the person who was the primary carer of a migrant worker’s or former migrant worker’s child who was attending educational courses in the host member state a right of residence in that state,… [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 3:06 pm
-COS.MET Srl v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am
On appeal from: [2013] UKSC 25 Background This case concerns the Government’s obligations under Directive 2008/50/EC (“the Air Quality Directive”) to reduce the levels of nitrogen dioxide in outdoor air in the UK. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:28 pm
European Parliament and Council on the power of the EC to regulate tobacco advertising. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
And in 2006 the ECJ ruled in the case of Richards v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C423/04) (2006) All ER (EC) 895 ECJ that the correct interpretation of Articles 4 and 7 of Directive 79/7/EC meant that the refusal of a retirement pension to a male to female transsexual until the age of 65 was prohibited if that person would have been entitled to such a pension at the age of 60 had she been held to be a woman as a matter of national law. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 2:20 pm
The Court annulled Directive 98/43/EC by its judgment in Case C-376/98 Germany v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:56 am
R (Tilianu) v Social Fund Inspector and another [2010] EWHC 213 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 54 “Although art 7(3)(b)-(d) of Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states (OJ 2004 L158, p 77), applied to formerly employed workers, it did not apply to those who had been self employed. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:07 pm
The post An EC Communication on SEPs – Not More Not Less appeared first on Antitrust Law Blog. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:07 pm
The post An EC Communication on SEPs – Not More Not Less appeared first on Antitrust Law Blog. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:24 pm
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/438 supplements the UCITS Directive (2009/65/EC) (as amended by the UCITS V Directive (2014/91/EU)). [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:22 am
The United States Supreme Court issued 5 opinions today: Microsoft v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 3:13 pm
Among ECJ decisions on Regulation (EC) no. 2201/03, there are already two, both of 2009, affecting art. 20; and another one is pending – aff. 256/09. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:02 am
Association belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL and others v Conseil des ministres (Case C-236/09); [2011] WLR (D) 67 “Article 5(2) of Council Directive 2004/113/EC was invalid with effect from 21 December 2012 since it permitted European Union law and consequently member states’ laws, to derogate from the principle of equal treatment of men and women, guaranteed by articles 21 and 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, without… [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 8:59 am
Based on the EC's interpretation of Huawei v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:03 pm
It posed the question whether the primary law of the EC (the EC Treaty) prohibits age discrimination and requires member States to prevent age discrimination even if the allegedly discriminatory treatment is unconnected to EC law. [read post]
