Search for: "ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL & another." Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2021, 1:00 am by Christian Romero
Danny O'Brien: So I think this leaves people generally confused as to what data is protected and from whom on their phones. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
– Warner Music buys share of Imeem.com file-sharing site: (Against Monopoly),How IP.com supports copyrights: (Securing Innovation),Sharing, part of the power of everybody: (Copyfight)Pharma & BiotechPharma & Biotech - GeneralIntricacies of choosing a pharmaceutical trade mark: (International Law Office),Commercial success v public interest: publicising clinical trial data: (Spicy IP),Big Pharma and neglected diseases: (Spicy IP),India: MNCs and patent applications:… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Of course, this comparison is necessarily subjective - take it as just another data point. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), Open licensing vs monopoly controlled supply: (KEI), Protecting inventions involving biofuel feedstock: (IP Law360), Brazil: ‘Public interest’ factor in Brazil’s patenting system: (Spicy IP), EU: Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 on advanced medicinal products to enter into force soon, creating certification procedure regarding quality and non-clinical data: (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Supreme Court less than a year after becoming attorney general, mooting any thoughts of revitalizing antitrust. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 8:11 am by Matthew Kahn
Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) for a conversation on Interventionism vs. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm
Lisa Madigan, Attorney General for the State of Illinois, launched an investigation at the same time as the Department of Justice. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
Americans have not historically been very willing to support in blood and treasure - and, today, attention span - long running wars or foreign policy agendas that do not seem to them both necessary to the national survival and broadly just.David Giacalone at f/k/a presents:haiku moments - memorial day 2006vietnam memorial --a tear in theold protestor's eyedagosanPhoto Credit: Susan Scott Teachey, ON-Q Design, Inc., from the Rolling Thunder Motorcycle Rally in support of MIA and POW.John Pape… [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
To determine how traditional securities regulation applies to ICOs, the SEC will undoubtedly apply the four-pronged Howey Test, derived from the 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC vs. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
To determine how traditional securities regulation applies to ICOs, the SEC will undoubtedly apply the four-pronged Howey Test, derived from the 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC vs. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 3:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
  ICOs Unlawfully Offering Securities for Sale to the Public   To determine how traditional securities regulation applies to ICOs, the SEC will undoubtedly apply the four-pronged Howey Test, derived from the 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC vs. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
The location of the lawsuit is where the corporate headquarters of the internet service provider (ISP) is located. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]