Search for: "ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 21 - 40
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
The legislation, formally the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act, empowers the Justice Department to serve legal process authorized by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) on U.S. providers for data those companies control, no matter where the data is located. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:35 am
This risks a race to the bottom, making it harder for the United States to protect the interests of its own residents and citizens, and undercutting ongoing international efforts to develop rules governing access to data across borders (see discussion of these efforts in the Part I.A. of the Electronic Privacy Information Center’s brief). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
-based Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a petition asking the FAA to consider privacy as the agency opens American skies to unmanned flight. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 10:41 am
In a friend-of-the-court brief—which was joined by the Brennan Center for Justice, Electronic Privacy Information Center, FreedomWorks, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Rutherford Institute—we argue that the panel decision is both wrong on the law and failed to appreciate the disparate burden of government surveillance borne by communities of color. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
Safe Harbour agreement which was invalidated on October 6, 2015, by the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
Safe Harbour agreement which was invalidated on October 6, 2015, by the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:29 am
More information about other states’ voter ID laws can be found from: The National Conference of State Legislatures, and The Electronic Privacy Information Center. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 11:22 am
EFF, joined by the Brennan Center for Justice, Electronic Privacy Information Center, FreedomWorks, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Rutherford Institute, filed an amicus brief arguing that the two previous court decisions upholding the constitutionality of the program misapplied Supreme Court precedent and failed to recognize the disproportionate impact of surveillance, like Baltimore’s program, on communities of… [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
The judge also noted, however, that the Department of Justice “does dispute whether Zhu's expectation of privacy was reasonable. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 10:30 am
The court also unfortunately found that the warrant did not violate California’s landmark Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA), which requires state warrants for electronic communication information to particularly describe the targeted individuals or accounts “as appropriate and reasonable. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:07 am
Background The dispute arose when the Justice Department brought a warrant to Microsoft – issued based upon probable cause under the SCA (18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
Laura Donohue is a Professor of Law, and Director of the Center on National Security and the Law, and Director of the Center on Privacy and Technology at the Georgetown University Law School. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
For instance, the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Hill and Gertz v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Using information gathered from the GPS, Hackney tracked the van to a shopping center parking lot in Calumet City, Illinois. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm
The detectives then sent all surveillance footage to the facial recognition section of the New York Police Department Real Time Crime Center (RTCC). [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:06 am
(For more background, see Bankston's 2007 article, "Only the DOJ Knows: The Secret Law of Electronic Surveillance.")In the past, the Department of Justice has claimed location tracking of cell phones was too imprecise to invade privacy and require a warrant, said panelist and attorney Stephanie Pell of SKP Stragies, since triangulation methods only allowed them to pinpoint a target within 100-300 feet. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:58 pm
In his recent majority opinion in the watershed Carpenter v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:45 am
The Court made no comment as it turned aside an unusual request by an advocacy group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (docket 13-58). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
Here’s an overview: The Court recognizes a “personal safety” exemption to disclosure under the Public Information Act Texas Department of Public Safety v. [read post]
