Search for: "ELLIS v. RACE" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
As I walked into Ellis One Unit, I didn’t know what to think. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
She attempted to enter the United States, but was “detained at Ellis Island. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Redbox Disney Not Liable For Disclosing Device IDs And Viewing Habits App Users Aren’t “Subscribers” Under the VPPA–Ellis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Recently, Clement and his colleagues went back to big law by joining Kirkland Ellis. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
., attorney in private practice (Kirkland & Ellis LLP); Hon. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
These elegant and novel chapters survey a broad spectrum, from economics, race, education, and professional concerns of lawyers, to plain old legal doctrine, to show how those variables affected the state’s development. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
A recent lower court decision in Ontario (Robinson v Lepage, 2015 ONSC 3128) found that a paralegal firm’s online donation to a part-time Small Claims court judge for a charity bike race raised a reasonable apprehension of bias. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
Earlier this year, Swift Transportation Company agreed to pay $4.4 million to resolve a class complaint alleging that it violated the FCRA by failing to obtain the authorization of online applicants before having criminal background checks run and then relied on the results to take adverse actions without notifying the applicants of their rights (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co of Arizona). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:59 am by Joy Waltemath
” The agency’s cross-motion for summary judgment was denied (Bauer v Holder, June 10, 2014, Ellis, T, III). [read post]