Search for: "ENRIGHT v STATE" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2010, 2:17 am by Adam Wagner
Clearly in this instance, it had no appetite for a Roe v Wade moment. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
Keith Enright explained that the CBPR system as “an important step toward enabling continued, trusted data flows between participating jurisdictions. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
For example, judges used to consider implicit (or unwritten) reasons in a decision, and this no longer will be sufficient after the Supreme Court’s decision in Vavilov (see for example, Farrier v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am by Eoin Daly
Ultimately, such a perception would have the potential to undermine public confidence in the judiciary, which in itself, is an important but overlooked sanction of  judicial independence (Mairead Enright made a similar point here). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am by Eoin Daly
This, it is argued, may ultimately undermine the rule of law and the safeguarding of constitutional rights against the political organs of the State. [read post]