Search for: "ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY"
Results 21 - 40
of 197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:06 am
—Environmental groups have filed a lawsuit to force the Environmental Protection Agency to establish new source performance standards for emissions of methane and other pollutants from coal mines (WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Pioneer Reserve used its pristine land to establish a mitigation bank which will make mitigation credits available under the law (the CWA) to the proponents of development projects that will require compensatory mitigation credits to offset projected environmental damages resulting from the development of the project. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, we wrote a short analysis outlining the major questions doctrine as laid out by the Court. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:39 pm
Holden v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
State Bd. of Forestry (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1215, 1219-1220, 1236 [“board abused its discretion when it evaluated and approved the THPs on the basis of a record that lacked information that other agencies had deemed necessary regarding the presence of old-growth dependent species” and CEQA imposed obligations on board to collect such information, without which it could not identify project’s environmental impacts]; Environmental Protection… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
State Bd. of Forestry (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1215, 1219-1220, 1236 [“board abused its discretion when it evaluated and approved the THPs on the basis of a record that lacked information that other agencies had deemed necessary regarding the presence of old-growth dependent species” and CEQA imposed obligations on board to collect such information, without which it could not identify project’s environmental impacts]; Environmental Protection… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
Importance of Wetlands Wetlands are integral to a healthy environment and mitigating the impacts of climate change. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Environmental Protection Agency and the Commonwealth of Virginia. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm
Sacramentans for Fair Planning v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
The Court then issued a declaratory judgment for the United States, directing that defendants restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waterways and permanently protect the waterways. [read post]
