Search for: "EX PARTE WES GOODE, Applicant" Results 21 - 40 of 1,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 8:02 am
Accordingly, we see no good reason to shift the burden now back to the Examiner to provide the argued-for showing. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:33 am by Mark Keenan
It’s a good idea to seek advice from a family law solicitor. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 3:01 am
  Current Fee New Fee as of 1/2/21 Application/Prosecution     TEAS Standard application (per class) $275 $350 TEAS Plus application (per class) $225 $250 Post Registration     Section 8 or 71 Declaration of Use (per class) $125 $225 Deletion of goods and/or services from a registration after submitting a Section 8 or 71 declaration but before the… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
  (Ex parte Nikolov, PTAB 2015.)Details: Ex parte NikolovAppeal 20130000274; Appl. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
  (Ex parte Nikolov, PTAB 2015.)Details: Ex parte NikolovAppeal 20130000274; Appl. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:27 am by USPTO
Which is why I’m pleased to announce that we are now accepting applications from qualified inventors for free legal assistance in ex parte appeal proceedings through the PTAB Pro Bono Program.The very definition of pro bono is “for the public good,” and the success of any pro bono program depends on volunteers with a strong, principled commitment to helping others. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:30 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Applicants must have viewed the USPTO’s training videos about the PTAB Pro Bono Program and ex parte appeal process. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 3:10 am
However, the lack of evidence of actual confusion had little probative value in this ex parte context, and in any case there was insufficient proof regarding sales of the products to determine whether there had been a reasonable opportunity for confusion to occur. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:14 am
" Details:  Ex parte STEPHEN JAMES BROWN Appeal 2009002452, Appl. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:09 am
As we view it, the language essentially is a distinction without a difference for purposes of our likelihood of confusion analysis.The differences in the way applicant's goods and the goods of the cited registrations are marketed are, of course, irrelevant, since the Board must make its Section 2(d) determination based on the goods as identified in the application and the registration. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:34 am
It also tried to argue priority, but of course that was irrelevant in this ex parte context. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 11:00 pm
In their ex part application, Biogen argued that there was good cause for the continuance because Plaintiff rescheduled her deposition a few times and they were not able to schedule Plaintiff's deposition earlier because of pending demurrers. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 9:01 am
Ex Parte Belinne, No. 2009-004693 (10 August 2009) (Informative Opinion)The appeal involved an invention relating to activating services when configuring a "build to order" system. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:24 am
The pointed out that "an abandonment or nonuse challenge would be appropriate in a cancellation proceeding, but it is not appropriate or permissible in this ex parte proceeding. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm by Dennis Crouch
On appeal, the Federal Circuit refused to engage on the merits of the dismissal – rather writing a one-sentence disclaimer of jurisdiction: Because we lack jurisdiction to review the termination of the ex parte reexamination proceedings, we dismiss the appeal of the termination of those proceedings. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We certainly don’t have a good way of getting rid of dreck applications, unless manifestly descriptive, which is often not the case for a popular phrase applied to various goods/services. [read post]