Search for: "Eager v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The Minnesota Court of Appeals decided that these types of warrants do not violate the United States and Minnesota constitutions per se, and further found that the warrant at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 4:41 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Nebraska Republicans are eager to avoid a repeat especially given that the 2024 election could come down to a single electoral vote.If enacted, this law should face constitutional questions under Trump v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Antonin Scalia had an acid tongue ("pure applesauce," "jiggery-pokery"), and he did his share of trolling as well (once responding to a law student's question about Bush v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
  That is, that in the context of business and human rights, States are far better equipped to transpose public regulatory structures onto private activity than they are, for the moment at least, to actually bind themselves and their domestic legal orders to the very international human rights regime they are more than eager to foist down supply chains beyond the borders of the State. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am by INFORRM
The immense influence of the media is evident when it reveals minor details to those eager for information. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Instead, relying exclusively on the dicta of a 77-year-old lower-court precedent, SEC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  One of them convened a mock Article V convention last summer with delegations (commonly Republican state legislators) from 49 states. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada recently decided in Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:58 pm by Rick Garnett
(There were a lot of back-and-forth postings about the Bush v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
  At that point, most states will probably continue to include Trump’s name on their general election ballots (especially if their state laws don’t authorize any exclusion, which might be true in the vast majority of states). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
More than a dozen years ago, Peter Mahler wrote about one such case, Barasch v Williams Real Estate Co. (33 Misc 3d 1219[A] [Sup Ct, NY County 2011]). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]