Search for: "EchoStar Satellite LLC"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
And Conyers and Chabot recall the 2002 unsuccessful DirecTV/EchoStar merger, wherein FCC ruled the deal was "inconsistent with the Commission's long-standing policy of not permitting one entity to control all of the spectrum for a particular service. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
In its opinion VOOM HD Holdings LLC, v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., in which the defendant had appealed from the trial court's grant of plaintiff's motion to impose sanctions for the spoilation of evidence, the First Department of the Appellate Division (in between NY's state trial level courts, unintuitively called Supreme Courts, and NY's highest court, the Court of Appeals), held... [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (1st Dept.2012); Zubulake v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (First Dept. 2012). [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
Echostar Satellite, L.L.C., 529 F.3d 617 (5th Cir. 2008). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:02 am
" Read on>>- New York Appellate Court Adopts Zubulake in Imposing Adverse Inference for Handling of E-Mails [Schnader]"In EchoStar, a unanimous First Department panel found that EchoStar Satellite LLC, the owner of the DISH Network satellite broadcasting company, failed in its duty to preserve relevant emails leading up to a contract dispute with Voom HD Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of Cablevision. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (1st Dept. 2012); and Zubulake v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:16 am
Echostar Satellite Corp., No. 02 C 3293, 2004 WL 2367740, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:22 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33, 939 N.Y.S.2d 321 (1st Dept. 2012), decision which held that “destruction that is the result of gross negligence” also “is sufficient to presume relevance. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:22 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33, 939 N.Y.S.2d 321 (1st Dept. 2012), decision which held that “destruction that is the result of gross negligence” also “is sufficient to presume relevance. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
Thus, " [o]nce a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it must suspend its routine document retention/destruction policy and put in place a litigation hold' to ensure the preservation of relevant documents'" (Voom VD Holdings LLC v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., ___ AD3d ___, 2010 NY Slip Op. 00658 [1st Dept 2012], quoting (Zubulake v UBS Warburg LLC, 220 FRD 212, 218 [SD NY 2003] ). [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:33 am
Echostar Satellite, LLC, 2008 U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:07 am
Echostar Satellite, 2009 U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:45 am
7-15-2008 National:One of the best places on the Internet to find information about a company -- such as a litigation adversary -- is the company's own Web site. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
The age of big data is upon us. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:03 am
Echostar Satellite, LLC, 529 F.3d 617, 626 (5th Cir .2008) (“We adopt the majority rule, which allows an informal, internal complaint to constitute protected activity under Section 215(a)(3), because it better captures the anti-retaliation goals of that section. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
