Search for: "Edmunds v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2012, 5:14 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A bit of digging into United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm
Edmund G. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm
Edmund G. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:53 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:05 am
Plaintiff Edmund Di Liscia, a devout Chassidic Jew and a Sailor in the United States Navy with a rating as an Electricians Mate, Nuclear Power 3rd Class Petty Officer (EMN3), seeks emergency relief to stop Defendants from forcing him to shave in violation of his sincerely held religious beliefs.2. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:13 pm
And the worst part is that the only umpires for this impending conflict will be: you guessed it -- unelected lawyers in black robes.What may come as news to some is that the United States has been there before -- and the results were not pretty.Start with a church's tax-exempt status: it can be removed for teaching and holding principles that are contrary to federal law, as happened in the 1983 case of Bob Jones University v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:42 am
Edmunds and Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, decided in 1878. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:47 pm
Posted: July 3, 2018 Maine’s Law Court finally issued its decision in State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:56 pm
Edmund E. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:15 pm
New York, Chisholm v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
In Edmund v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 10:04 pm
Stephens, 387 F.3d at 1226-27; United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
Edmund Randolph and Federalist 15. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 183 (1949) (Jackson, J., dissenting)], DUIs? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied defendants motion for summary judgment in favor of the employee. [read post]
