Search for: "Edward Ed Markey" Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2018, 12:50 pm by Joe Consumer
The letter was signed by Senators Richard Blumenthal, Patrick Leahy, Christopher Coons, Edward Markey, Kirsten Gillibrand, Richard Durbin, Elizabeth Warren, Sheldon Whitehouse, Mazie Hirono and Catherine Cortez Masto. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:59 am by Brian Finucane
The White House emphasized that the directive did not establish any “new standards” but instead “spell[ed] out publicly the existing standard by the international law” and further that with respect to Israel “we have not seen any violations of the standards so have no plans to restrict assistance at this time. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm by Elliot Setzer
Michael Osterholm, Director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota; Bennett Butler, Legislative Assistant at the Office of Senator Ed Markey; Ali Lange, Public Policy Manager at Google; Lauren Sarkesian, Senior Policy Counsel at New America’s Open Technology Institute; and will be moderated by Sharon Bradford Franklin, Policy Director at New America’s Open Technology Institute. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Biden Administration’s Deep Ties to Uber, Lyft in Spotlight After Vaccine-Assistance Partnership Announced ABC News – Soo Rin Kim and Lucien Bruggeman | Published: 5/17/2021 When the White House announced an agreement with Uber and Lyft to offer free rides to vaccine sites as part of President Biden’s aim to inoculate 70 percent of Americans against the coronavirus by the Fourth of July, the partnership drew praise but also questions. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]