Search for: "Edwards v. Gibson" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:30 am by gmlevine
Edward Slack, Simple Truth Publishing, D2010-1349 (WIPO September 20, 2010), citing Porto Chico Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
The book was published by Edward Elgar Publishing as part of its Intellectual Property Law and Practice series, which itself is co-edited by two Katfriends, practitioner Trevor Cook and academic Jo Gibson. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
The IPKat has quite lost count of the intellectual property titles from Edward Elgar Publishing that have been reviewed on this weblog. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:18 am by John Jascob
Returning to Hungar’s medical analogy, Judge Edwards observed that sometimes the best we can do is exploratory surgery because we are not precisely sure, so we need to take a look. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R v Markham and Edwards ([2017] EWCA Crim 739) the Court of Appeal upheld the order of Haddon-Cave J permitting the press to name Kim Edwards and Lucas Markham, 15 year olds, who were convicted of the murder of Ms Edwards’ mother and sister. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]