Search for: "Edwards v. Sims" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am by Albéniz Couret Fuentes
” Thayer’s argument was echoed in Justice Edward Douglas White’s concurring opinion in the 1901 decision in Downes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am by Susan Brenner
Sims, 2009–Ohio–550 (Ohio Court of Appeals 2009). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Council Regulation 1229/2008 enters San Simón da Costa (PDO), Ail blanc de Lomagne (PGI), Steirischer Kren (PGI) into Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Class 46) Court of First Instance, consolidating four appeals, annuls decisions of Board of Appeal and awards costs to Budvar in proceedings over BUD appellation: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Office for… [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many years ago, I got into a strange sort of contretemps with Judge Harry Edwards of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I wanted another WR and it was either Breaston, Braylon Edwards or Santonio Holmes. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]