Search for: "Elliott v. Elliott" Results 21 - 40 of 758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
It also aligns with the Legislature's recent amendment of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq., to explicitly prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Judith Gaskell
Robert Elliott, a formerly enslaved person, debating Rep. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
It proposes a "spirit of the Constitution" approach based on McCullough v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Howard Wasserman
The descendants of the plaintiffs in Briggs v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
Elliott for historical correctness, but the issue is a bit complex and the court likely had several reasons for putting the Kansas case first. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Robert Brammer
Robert Elliott, a formerly enslaved person, debating Rep. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2023, Nicklin J made orders in the cases of Harcombe v Associated Newspaper Limited & anr QB-2020-000799 and Kendrick v Associated Newspaper Limited & anr QB-2020-00080. [read post]
7 May 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
L’application de la Loi sur la sécurité privée à l’intimée ne cause pas de véritable entrave. [read post]