Search for: "Employee Relations v. Labor Relations Bd." Results 21 - 40 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
"Holding that this policy "was reasonably designed to promote truthful responses by discouraging coaching," the Appellate Division concluded that such action did not deprive the employee of his right to union representation under Civil Service Law §75(2) or National Labor Relations Bd. v J. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Section III(D) of Port Authority's Labor Relations Instruction excludes "the mission and management responsibilities of the Authority, including its ... staffing [and] operating ... [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Section III(D) of Port Authority's Labor Relations Instruction excludes "the mission and management responsibilities of the Authority, including its ... staffing [and] operating ... [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
" Holding that this policy “was reasonably designed to promote truthful responses by discouraging coaching,” the Appellate Division concluded that such action did not deprive the employee of his right to union representation under Civil Service Law §75(2) or National Labor Relations Bd. v J. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:56 am by Andrew Frisch
In particular, she refers to the Energy Reorganization Act, the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”), and the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act. [read post]