Search for: "England v. Department of Defense" Results 21 - 40 of 188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Additionally, Jackson held that RAKIA had not met the “heavy burden” of persuading the district court that England was a necessary alternative forum that would provide Azima an adequate remedy. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
In announcing the plan, Johnson stated that COVID-19 “restrictions pose a heavy toll” on the country and England did “not need to pay that cost any longer. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am by Richard Hunt
On December 6 the Department of Justice entered a Consent Decree in Self, Inc. et al v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:03 pm by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
In addition to these well-known programs, the Department of Defense spends tens of billions of dollars every year providing health care to service members, veterans and their families through programs like TRICARE. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Department of Defense funding to build a wall along the southern border. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Daimler argues that Conversant's unspecified reference to the FRAND metholodogy of an England & Wales High Court ruling (Unwired Planet v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm by Matthias Weller
In the discussed case the judge refers explicitly to the need of the physical presence of the parties, and especially of the mother, for him to get personal impression, and to give her full opportunity to present her defense and to ensure fair trial. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
In October, the US Treasury Department blocked PDVSA bondholders from collecting their collateral for 90 days. [read post]
To Bowman, “definitional impeachment” can be defensive in that it seeks to preserve “existing constitutional interpretations, institutional relationships, [and] political norms and values against presidential assault. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:17 pm by John Rubin
Defendant not entitled to instruction on defense of justification to possession of firearm by person previously convicted of a felony where he testified at trial that he did not possess the firearm State v. [read post]