Search for: "England v. Parke"
Results 21 - 40
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2007, 3:59 am
[Maybe I should go back to the parking bay when the ‘heavenly presence’ is away watching England v Australia in the Rugby World Cup] Anyway… before I let this episode grow into yet another reason for compulsive muttering disorder or trigger another attack of Tourette’s syndrome, I shall move on to other matters… So what else is happening in the world of blawgs? [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:47 am
Subscription service Lawtel picked this little post-franchising case up today: ChipsAway International Ltd v Errol Kerr [2008] EWHC 1887 (Ch) , a decision of the Chancery Division for England and Wales. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Batt Cables Plc v Spencer Business Parks Ltd [2010] ScotCS CSOH_81 (01 July 2010) A new case on BAILII from the outer House of the Court of Session (approximately equivalent to the High Court). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Batt Cables Plc v Spencer Business Parks Ltd [2010] ScotCS CSOH_81 (01 July 2010) A new case on BAILII from the outer House of the Court of Session (approximately equivalent to the High Court). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:19 am
Malik v LB Tower Hamlets [2010] EWHC 2921 (Admin) And so, another council tax/HMO appeal finds its way to the High Court. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:16 pm
Fortunately, as illustrated by a recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in The Sidney and North Saanich Memorial Park Society v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:10 pm
Under Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
For example, in Sheffield Wednesday Football Club Ltd v Hargreaves [2007] EWHC 2375 (QB), Mr Justice Parkes refused to grant a Norwich Pharmacal order to disclose the names and IP addresses of Sheffield Wednesday fans who had made abusive comments on a fan website because it was not proportionate to do so. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 223, 225 (1769). [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm
Buglife, R (on the application of) v Natural England [2011] EWHC 746 (Admin) – Read judgment All public lawyers know that judicial review must be commenced “promptly and in any event not later than 3 months” after the public act complained of, failing which a claimant is at the mercy of the court as to whether to extend time. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
The Court also observed that nuisance does not protect privacy in related jurisdictions, referring to the High Court of Australia decision in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor ((1937) 58 CLR 479). [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:25 am
In 2010, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Papadopoulous v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
Judge Henderson filed a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment; Judge Srinivasan filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (Verizon New England Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:33 pm
Two years later, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
On Wednesday 19th and Thursday 20th April the Court will hear the case of Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park Ltd and others, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 651. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:20 am
The England v Kenya cricket game is about to begin. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
