Search for: "England v. Social Security"
Results 21 - 40
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
In particular, should the court take account of either: (a) budgetary constraints imposed on the housing authority; or (b) the availability of housing under a non-secured tenancy under Part VII of the 1996 Act (as opposed to a secured tenancy under Part VI of the 1996 Act). [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
This appeal is considering whether, where a claim to PIP under the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013 is based on a person needing social support to engage with other people, the social support must be needed contemporaneously with the engagement, and whether anything that constitutes needing “prompting” to be able to engage with other people also constitutes social support. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:35 pm
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Barry v London Borough of Southwark [2008] EWCA Civ 1440 concerned an EEA national’s eligibility for social housing, via a Part VII application. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:36 pm
– Washington, DC attorney Steven Berk on his blog, The Corporate Observer FTC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Flowing from economic abuse and IPV more generally, the financial impact on survivors is profound, including undermining their economic security and ability to leave an abusive relationship. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
So far the business of the Courts in England and Wales continues. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
At its November 10 Conference, the Court considers such issues as the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, eligibility for Social Security benefits, and the interaction of the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
SEC Brings SPAC Enforcement Action and Signals More to Come Posted by Adam Brenneman, Rahul Mukhi, and Jared Gerber, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Friday, August 6, 2021 Tags: IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation, SPACs Shareholder Meetings and Freedom Rides: The Story of Peck v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
After Baker v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 1:32 pm
Andrew’s a secure psychiatric facility in England. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, March 11, 2020 Tags: Conflicts of interest, Institutional Investors, Investment advisers, Proxy season, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots The Toshiba Securities Litigation: Perils For Foreign Issuers Posted by Roger Cooper, Jared Gerber, and Les Silverman, Cleary Gottlieb Steen &… [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
My blog for @CenDemTech about why this is v. worrisome. https://www.cdt.org/blogs/gs-hans/0611overbroad-subpoena-airbnb-user-data-smacks-general-warrant … “Does the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:05 pm
A large and permanent majority of the American people immediately accepted Social Security as a constitutional solution to poverty among the elderly and to massive unemployment (since Social Security would open up jobs by encouraging people to retire sooner). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:50 am
Note: For those lawyers among our readers, the District Court decision is Justin Goldman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
In the aftermath of the global credit crunch, the second G20 Summit, which was to commence on 2 April 2009, was an obvious target of public frustration and anger in respect of a range of economic and social issues. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
The builder puts in 3.5% of the sale price and the government puts in "additional security for the loan in the form of a guarantee" (para 20). 100,000 households will be supported through this scheme. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
The builder puts in 3.5% of the sale price and the government puts in "additional security for the loan in the form of a guarantee" (para 20). 100,000 households will be supported through this scheme. [read post]
