Search for: "English v. Clarke"
Results 21 - 40
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2022, 8:06 am
StockX and Hermès v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
If induced to comply with the House’s subpoenas, Bannon, Meadows, Navarro and Scavino—like their possible co-conspirators John Eastman, Michael Flynn, Jeffrey Clark, Roger Stone and Alex Jones—might invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 10:12 am
” Grant v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
" A barrier to the NAACP's argument for anonymous speech rights was Lewis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
In 1972, in Laird v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am
In our recent paper, we critique Abbott’s proposal whilst contemplating AI’s status as property or person.It is perhaps most interesting to compare the contrasting fortunes of the Project’s filings in Australia (Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879) and England and Wales (Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat)/Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021] EWCA Civ… [read post]
The appearance of a substantial defence in possession claims, and property guardians and possession.
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
In Westminster CC v Clarke (1992) 2 AC 288 (a hostel for the homeless), exclusive possession was found to be inconsistent with the purposes for which the Council provided the accommodation. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
The ‘consequential’ losses suffered in England were accordingly sufficient to ground English jurisdiction for the tort claims. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
In the case of Fairhurst v Woodard [pdf] in the Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that security cameras and a Ring doorbell “unjustifiably invaded” the privacy of a neighbour, broke data laws and contributed to harassment. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 10:27 am
Thompson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
The English government has not yet committed to such a regime. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The case will proceed in the English court.Unless it settles, we can expect this case to pop up in a later volume of Retromark.5. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:22 pm
And then there was Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:00 am
Prowse et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:24 am
However, it was recoverable under Florida law and so was recoverable in the English Admiralty proceedings. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
In Colgrove v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Soriano v Forensic News LLC [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) is interesting in a number of respects but in particular for its analysis of the circumstances in which the GDPR will apply to a publisher (or indeed any data controller/processor) based outside of the EU. [read post]
