Search for: "Entity Does (1-20)" Results 21 - 40 of 3,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 2:58 pm by Marco Rossi
   Whenever the customer is an entity, as opposed to a natural person, article 20, paragraph 1 of the Decree provides a general definition of beneficial owner, as follows: The beneficial owner of customers different from natural persons is identified with the natural person or natural persons to whom, ultimately, the direct or indirect ownership or control of the entity is attributable. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:24 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
Fee for the preliminary examination of an international application 1830 1840 1915 75 4.1% 20. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:25 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The minimum wage applicable to California food restaurants increases to $20 per hour on April 1, 2024. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 8:37 am by Martin A. Schwartz
What does this type of reporting accomplish other than to increase legal bills? [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:53 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Furthermore, the settlement also makes clear that merely because the patient or some other party has shared the same information with the media or others does not excuse the health care provider or other covered entity or business associate from the obligation to keep confidential the PHI unless it gets proper consent or otherwise can show that an exception to HIPAA applies. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In vain:*** Translation of the German original ***[1.1] The [opponent] contests that Siemens AG is entitled to file an appeal.[1.2] As a consequence of the entry of the merger into the register of the seat of the receiving legal entity (übernehmender Rechtsträger) – in the present case, Siemens AG having its seat in Munich – the Flender AG does not exist any more as a legal person and its assets including the patent rights have been transferred to Siemens AG… [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Sept. 20, 2021) (prior publication by a subset of inventors qualifies as a 102(b)(1) exception); and MPEP 2153.01(a) (“If … the application names fewer joint inventors than a publication (e.g., the application names as joint inventors A and B, and the publication names as authors A, B and C), it would not be readily apparent from the publication that it is by the inventor (i.e., the inventive entity) or a joint inventor and the publication would be treated as… [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 11:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State . . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:45 am by Patricia McManus
A temporary restraining order issued on October 20, 2009, however, has blocked enforcement of the law until at least December 4, 2009.* (Davis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:18 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Where plaintiff filed suit against several governmental entities, including an emergency 911 board, based on the failure of the multiple entities to respond to and close a road that suffered a mudslide in a timely manner, the public duty doctrine barred plaintiff’s claims against two of those entities. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:50 am by Nichole M. Baer
The Act does expressly exempt several types of entities from reporting. [read post]
Notably, the Act does not apply to employees of (1) government entities, (2) employers that are parties to a collective bargaining agreement (unless 20 or more full-time employees are not covered by such agreement, in which case those employees are eligible for the Act’s benefits), or (3) employers that are not required by law to pay federal, state, and city payroll taxes. [read post]