Search for: "Environmental Council of Sacramento v. County of Sacramento" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2019 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm by William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
County of Butte v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2019 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm by William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
County of Butte v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
UPDATED GENERAL PLAN DID NOT VIOLATE THE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENT. EIR FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPHELD AGAINST MULTIPLE CHALLENGES. LOS CHALLENGE RENDERED MOOT BY REVISIONS TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21099(B)(2).
6 Jan 2020, 4:08 pm by William W. Abbott
City of Sacramento (2019) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
UPDATED GENERAL PLAN DID NOT VIOLATE THE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENT. EIR FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPHELD AGAINST MULTIPLE CHALLENGES. LOS CHALLENGE RENDERED MOOT BY REVISIONS TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21099(B)(2).
6 Jan 2020, 4:08 pm by William W. Abbott
City of Sacramento (2019) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
“ROG Won: A CEQA Wars Story” – Third District Holds Geothermal Energy Project EIR’s Rejection Of Proposed Mitigation Measures For Significant ROG Fugitive Emissions Impact Violated CEQA Where No Substantial Evidence Showed Measures’ Infeasibility
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City Council (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1011, 1029; Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Out With The Old (And In With The New … Next Year)! – Third District Rejects CEQA And General Plan Consistency Challenges to Sacramento’s 2035 General Plan Update And Related EIR, Holds Traffic Analysis Challenge Based On Lowering of Acceptable LOS Is Mooted By Public Resources Code § 20199, But New VMT Standard Doesn’t Yet Apply
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The City of Sacramento received an early Christmas present with the December 18 publication of the Third District Court of Appeal’s opinion in Citizens for Positive Growth & Preservation v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenges To Chico Walmart Expansion Project EIR’s Urban Decay Analysis And City’s Statement Of Overriding Considerations
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Top Regulatory Stories of 2017
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
RegBlog - http://www.regblog.org/
Keeping CEQA In Its Lane: First District Holds Substantial Evidence Supports EIR’s Conclusion That “Urban Decay” Is Not Reasonably Foreseeable Indirect Effect Of Project Relocating Trial Court Operations From Historic Placerville Courthouse
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
El Dorado County is a largely rural area and its County seat, Placerville, is a town of about 10,000 persons located in the Sierra Nevada foothills about 45 miles northeast of Sacramento. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Minor Changes In Project Did Not Invalidate An EIR. Failure To Justify A Different Threshold Of Significance For Downtown Intersections Result In EIR Being Set Aside.
17 Jan 2017, 9:12 am by Abbott & Kindermann
East Sacramento Partnerships for a Livable City v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2016 CEQA ANNUAL REVIEW
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
County of Fresno, S219783 (F066798, 226 Cal.App.4th 704); Fresno County Superior Court; 11CECG00706, 11CECG00709, 11CECG00726.) [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Sacramento Residential Infill Project EIR Violated CEQA By Basing Less-Than-Significant Traffic Impact Finding Solely On Compliance With General Plan Policy Allowing LOS F
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
” (Quoting County of Inyo v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Proposed CEQA Guidelines Amendments: A Critique of OPR’s “Preliminary Discussion Draft” (Part III – Proposed “Minor Technical Improvements”)
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of San Diego (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 55 [siting agreement between County and CDCR requiring County to identify potential state reentry facility sites was not project approval subject to CEQA]; Parchester Village Neighborhood Council v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenge To Program EIR For California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Statewide Fish Hatchery/Stocking Enterprise
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
Code Regs., § 15126.4(a)(1)(B); Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2014 CEQA ANNUAL REVIEW
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Ag Assn., S218240 (C070836; depublished opinion, Sacramento County Superior Court; No. 34-2011-80000902CUWMGDS). [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2014 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
               EXEMPTIONS Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2014 CEQA 1st QUARTER REVIEW
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
County of Marin (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 1098). [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Plaintiff’s Failure to Request CEQA Hearing Within 90 Days of Filing Petition Due to Lead Attorney’s “Excusable” Calendaring Error Warrants Discretionary Relief Under CCP § 473, Holds Second District
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (See County of Sacramento v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2013 MID-YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW UPDATE
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in maintaining venue in Sacramento County. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/