Search for: "Epps v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2020, 1:14 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Delaware’s Weird—and Constitutionally Suspect—Approach to Judicial Independence By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps discusses an upcoming Supreme Court case, Carney v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
America May Be Nearing the End of the Roe Era By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps looks at the Supreme Court’s upcoming abortion case, June Medical Services v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:10 pm
United States (1993), The Federalist Papers, and a Justice Department memo prove that not allowing witnesses in an impeachment trial would be unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
”To complicate matters, however, a federal statute appears to delegate to the Archivist of the United States the power to decide whether an amendment is valid. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
Mesa, which “asks whether there is a remedy for a Mexican citizen killed when a Border Patrol agent in the United States opens fire on someone in Mexico,” and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm
But California's position was greatly strengthened by the Supreme Court's May 2018 ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment finding that Congress properly delegated authority to the U.S. attorney general to apply the registration requirements of a sex-offender-registration law, “may presage a coming sea change in judicial review of agency rules implementing broad Congressional directives. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:39 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
United States, the justices voted 7-2 to reaffirm the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, allowing federal and state governments to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps writes that last week’s decision in Nieves v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps explains that “[a]lthough the case has constitutional dimensions—the census itself is created by the Constitution— the result is likely to turn on whether the Department of Commerce, which administers the census, properly read Title 13 of the United States Code. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
United States, in which the justices considered whether a period of pretrial imprisonment can toll a term of federal supervised release, comes from Fiona Doherty. [read post]
