Search for: "Estate of Lee (1981)"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
”12 As Householder explains: It would be similarly fallacious to say that in a real estate transaction, the money paid to the seller is only a secondary consideration, with the primary value of the transaction consisting of the conveyance of the parcel to the buyer. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
And the importance of this private right shouldn’t be minimized, as the Ninth Circuit noted in 1981: Despite what is said in some of the authorities that the author’s interest in securing an economic reward for his labors is “a secondary consideration,” it is clear that the real purpose of the copyright scheme is to encourage works of the intellect, and that this purpose is to be achieved by reliance on the economic incentives granted to authors and inventors by the… [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Dallas Court of Appeals addresses complex issues in appeal from summary judgment in suit by tort clients who sued their lawyers for barratry CARL "STACEY" NEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.N., C.N., L.N., AND C.N., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
UPDATE ON NEESE VS. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:49 am
Bradlee’s boss. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Estate of Hemingway v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Anti bias harassment criminal law constitutionalSTATE OF NEW JERSEY V. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I thought I’d pass along two briefs that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Originally published on Feb. 28, 2021; updated on Apr. 9, 2022. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
BRENDA LIRA, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GUADALUPE QUESADA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00112-CV, 407 SW3d 810, 06-26-13) ATTORNEY-FEE ARBITRATION CASE INFO (CONSOLIDATED INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND MANDAMUS PROCEEDING) No. 13-1026 ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said : (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Can neighbours sue for historic contamination? [read post]
