Search for: "Estate of Lee (1981)" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I thought I’d pass along two briefs that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
”12 As Householder explains: It would be similarly fallacious to say that in a real estate transaction, the money paid to the seller is only a secondary consideration, with the primary value of the transaction consisting of the conveyance of the parcel to the buyer. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
And the importance of this private right shouldn’t be minimized, as the Ninth Circuit noted in 1981: Despite what is said in some of the authorities that the author’s interest in securing an economic reward for his labors is “a secondary consideration,” it is clear that the real purpose of the copyright scheme is to encourage works of the intellect, and that this purpose is to be achieved by reliance on the economic incentives granted to authors and inventors by the… [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
Can neighbours sue for historic contamination? [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:10 pm by Hull and Hull LLP
The first story is about the sale of Lee Harvey Oswald’s coffin. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:32 am
May 1981: After a class action suit is filed on behalf of inmates, U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 9:50 pm
Interestingly, Fogel got his start in 1981 by working for Cohl at CPI. [read post]
5 Nov 2005, 11:01 am
S.C.); and Re Keating Estate, [1981] N.S.J. [read post]