Search for: "Eugene Wright"
Results 21 - 40
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Chase and Alexandra Settelmayer (Davis Wright Tremaine LLP), and Dana R. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 8:52 am
Guests: Eugene Volokh, professor at UCLA School of Law David Greene, senior staff attorney and civil liberties director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation Alison Schary, partner at Davis Wright Tremaine www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email… [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:59 am
Congratulations to Katherine Bolger (Davis Wright Tremaine LLP), who represents the magazine. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:37 am
Jones, president and founder of the Public Religion Research Institute, Eugene Scott, a national political reporter at the Washington Post, and Mona Charen, policy editor at The Bulwark. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:44 pm
Cate-Gumpert (Davis Wright Tremaine LLP), who represent defendants. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:29 pm
" After Wright sought a more detailed explanation, PayPal told him he would need to "submit a legal subpoena. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
The Trinity Legal Term ended on Friday 29 July 2022. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:53 am
Balin of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, who represented the Newspaper Defendants, and thanks to the Media Law Resource Center (MLRC) MediaLawDaily for the pointer. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:32 pm
Congratulations to Elizabeth McNamara, Rachel Strom, Eric Feder, and Carl Mazurek of David Wright Tremaine LLP, who represented Baron Cohen. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
Kennedy & Eugene Volokh, The New Taboo: Quoting Epithets in the Classroom and Beyond, 49 Cap. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
Congratulations to Kelli Sager, Dan Laidman, and Sarah Burns of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on their victory. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The Ada Lovelace Institute has published an independent review of the UK’s regulation of biometric technologies, authored by Matthew Ryder QC, which found that the UK requires “an ambitious new legislative framework specific to biometrics,” as the current regulatory regime is “fragmented, confused and failing to keep pace. [read post]
24 May 2022, 11:05 am
[The claims arise out of “UPMC’s purported disclosure of their confidential medical information to [child protection authorities] for the purpose of targeting them with highly intrusive, humiliating and coercive child abuse investigations starting before taking their newborn babies home from UPMC’s hospitals shortly after childbirth. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal Agencies Announce Plans for More Equity in Federal Programs MSN – Michael Macagnone (Roll Call) | Published: 4/14/2022 Dozens of federal agencies launched plans that focus on minority groups and other underserved communities, meant to open federal programs to more people and reduce racial disparities caused by government decisions. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 10:18 am
Louisiana; Wright v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
Stone (Miss. 1979); Wright v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:17 pm
I haven't read this new white paper yet from the Media Law Resource Center (it's about 200 pages long), but it seems quite interesting; here's the Table of Contents [UPDATE: link to paper fixed]: Preface • iii Floyd Abrams Introduction and Executive Summary • 1 Chapter 1: A Response to Justice Thomas • 9 Matthew Schafer Chapter 2: A Response to Justice Gorsuch • 79 Richard Tofel and Jeremy Kutner Chapter 3: The Empirical Reality of Contemporary Libel Litigation… [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:34 pm
The following day, after Hensley emailed the video, he received a response from Keilberg indicating that NALGD would cover the fees: OK [NALGD] will wright [sic] you a check for $3,000.00 for you to pay your attorney. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Wright, decided yesterday by Judge Amos Mazzant (E.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
[Or for that matter to women, to unmarried women, or to women based on age, race, national origin, religion, citizenship (other-"natural-born" or otherwise), and the like?] [read post]