Search for: "European Patent Office"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 9:58 am
The Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘EUIPO’) rejected the opposition. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 11:34 pm
EPO case law book survey The Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (‘EPO’) publish the ‘Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO’ (‘Case Law Book’) every three years with a view to helping practitioners and other stakeholders keep abreast of its jurisprudence. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:57 am
Background On 24 October 2018, The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (‘KaiKai’) filed an application for the registration of twelve Community designs with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘EUIPO’), claiming priority based on a Patent Cooperation Treaty (‘PCT’) patent application filed on 26 October 2017. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:34 am
Assignment Center replaces EPAS and ETAS The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced the replacement of the Electronic Patent Assignment System (EPAS) and Electronic Trademark Assignment System (ETAS) with the modernised Assignment Center with effect from 5 February 2024. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:07 am
The Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (BRPTO) has issued a new set of guidelines to clarify its recent regulations on amending patent claims during the appellate phase and help patent applicants adapt to the new policy. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
He is pursuing an LLM in European Intellectual Property Law at Stockholm University. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:18 pm
A new competence centre within the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) will be responsible for these tasks. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:30 pm
That said, a technique, consisting of the progressive registration of national trade marks for the same sign with the aim of bypassing the six-month cooling-off period under Article 29(1) of Regulation No 207/2009, cannot be evaluated as genuine and licit commercial conduct (T-627/21), since all the national trade mark applications were progressively rejected by the Austrian Patent Office for non-payment of the related registration fees. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:22 am
The Board members are appointed by the Presidential Office. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:19 am
In 1991, CeramTec obtained a European Patent to a ceramic matrix composite, used in the production of this hip-replacement implant. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The German Patent and Trademark Office rejected the application for most of the goods and services due to lack of distinctiveness. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:22 am
Competence and Enforcement of UPC and PMAC final decisions The PMAC, established by Article 35 UPC Agreement, can administer mediation and arbitration of disputes on European patents and European patents with unitary effect. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 2:16 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and courts traditionally assess patentability based on the expertise of PHOSITA (35 U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
Learn how software or computer programs can be patented in the United States, as well as the United Kingdom and other commercially important regimes of the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 7:01 am
The European Parliament has voted to ban patents for gene-edited plants. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
The Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office (epi), along with other bodies and companies, has called upon MEPs to reconsider the proposed amendment to ban patents on NGT plants. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
All forms of IP, ranging from copyright, to trademarks, patents, and geographical indications are accepted. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:25 am
Moreover, no SPC examiners shall be appointed from national patent offices that do not examine the Article 3(c) and 3(d) conditions (in contrast to the initial legislative proposals which allowed one examiner from such national patent offices per panel). [read post]
