Search for: "Evans v. Marks"
Results 21 - 40
of 565
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Ryan Goodman and Juilee Shivalkar, Mark Meadows Timeline: The Chief of Staff and Schemes to Overturn 2020 Election (Aug. 8, 2021) 10. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
IPKat considers how this reveals a dystopian vision of the trademark world, composed of words, images and objects, “floating about but not directly connected to the goods, and therefore fair game to be monopolised as a trade mark right. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
Australia’s highest court emphatically rejected the relevance of reputation in either the allegedly infringing or infringed mark is relevant to the assessment of deceptive similarity, ruling that PROTOX and “instant BOTOX alternative” do not infringe the registered trade mark BOTOX. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
Evans, 536 U. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
Biden will arrive in Belfast to mark the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday peace agreement. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Still, the two constructs were the tools they had to get themselves there, and they had to be used in certain ways or else appear to pass–in Mark’s words–”from lawyerly deliberation to sheer willfulness” (to quote Mark’s rendering of Harlan Fiske Stone’s verdict on Colgate v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Mark Haight 51. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Rodgers and Evan A. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
But in a series of decisions, culminating in Kelly v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:10 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C).PANELISTS Bennett Evan CooperDickinson Wright PLLCCounsel For RespondentProf. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 2:34 am
This case illustrates the need for brand owners to have a zero-tolerance approach and be vigilant about trade mark misuse by others, to protect themselves with registered trade marks and use the courts to enforce where necessary. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
From New York trial judge Ariel Chesler's opinion last month in Z.U. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
This is according to a statement made by the press service of Yevgeny V. [read post]
