Search for: "Everett v. Black" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2012, 1:49 pm
  True, you can't do it on a basis that's constitutionally impermissible; e.g., you can't only ask black people to show their tickets but not whites. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" http://bit.ly/e64qRT it won't be the same without peter everett ... [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am by @ErikJHeels
(Everett, MA) Buenos Multiservices Inc. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:24 am by Randy Barnett
I think the better analysis of the Thirteenth Amendment was explained by Justice Harlan in his dissenting opinions in the Civil Rights Cases and Plessy v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Allston, MA; Tae Yi, President) Black Trace, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Domain Name Law White hat domainers are not black hat cybersquatters. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 9:11 pm
Presumably that's why the city saw fit to contract out the menial task to a private mom-and-pop operation, rather than using its own workers, not to mention officials.Tooke v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
And if that is not the Texas pot calling the kettle black, then I don't know what is. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]