Search for: "Ex Parte Abell" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
Thanks, Simon Haslam (Abel & Imray), spotting it.This was Halliburton's appeal against the decision of Pumfrey J (here , noted by the IPKat here), that its patent for rotary cone drill bits was invalid for insufficiency. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
An ex-girlfriend accused him of breaking into her house, raping her, and carving an "X" into her chest. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm by Trent
Retail Decisions thereafter initiated an ex parte reexamination of the patent. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-9 (Denver, CO)Ex Parte Order dated April 4, 2007 (Granting Ex Parte Order, But Declining to Rule that Court Order is Unnecessary)*Arista v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:57 am
CyperSource asserted '154 against Retail Decisions, who initiated an ex parte reexam, leaving the court case stayed pending reexam. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:47 am by lopeznoriega
Observé la entrega de nuevo mobiliario para la oficina del profesor Gold por parte del Departamento de Recursos Materiales. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
Supp. 740, 781 (E.D.N.Y.1984), aff’d in pertinent part, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987). [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 10 February 2016, Dove J dismissed an application by persistent litigant Kamran Malik for an ex parte order banning Donald Trump from entering the United Kingdom. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The PCC’s director, Stephen Abell, is to step down later this month. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am by Law Lady
"The court ruled that since D.V. knew she carried the herpes virus, transmission of the disease to her ex-boyfriend was not an accident.Settlement Dispute: INSURER'S FINDING OF CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE COULD BE BAD FAITH, Zintel v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:04 am
A mi juicio, el principal escollo que presenta la reforma de 2005, en relación al reconocimiento ex lege de la custodia compartida, aparece en aquellos procesos judiciales de separación o divorcio denominados contenciosos o de mutuo disenso; rechazando algunos pronunciamientos judiciales qué, en estos supuestos, se garantice adecuadamente el interés del menor. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm by familoo
But a report which makes such significant claims and criticisms (it’s title is premised upon the assertion that the family courts do not put children first) needs to be observably even-handed with the available evidence, so this struck me as a poor choice on the part of the authors of the relea [read post]