Search for: "Ex Parte CV"
Results 21 - 40
of 719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
Plaintiffs contend that Defendants’ ex parte communications with Mr. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
Plaintiffs contend that Defendants’ ex parte communications with Mr. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:21 am
[Defendant] had a choice of applying for ex parte reexamination or inter partes review. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 3:38 am
Buckwalter of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:33 am
The court granted defendant's motion to stay pending ex parte reexamination and rejected plaintiff's claim of undue prejudice based on defendant's choice of ex parte reexamination instead of the new inter partes procedure. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Under the statute, however, ex parte interviews are not unlimited. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:12 am
Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, 2-09-cv-02419 (NVD June 17, 2013, Order) (Ferenbach, M.J.). [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 10:26 am
John WardHolding: Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination DENIEDDefendants requested a stay pending ex parte reexamination of the patent in suit and/or completion of another case. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:05 am
It’s granted in large part. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 12:20 am
Plaintiff's motion to stay pending ex parte reexamination was denied. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:49 am
Liyanghua, 11-cv-07970 (N.D. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
Flying Crocodile Inc et al, 2-19-cv-01278 (WDWA Dec. 28, 2021), the Court granted defendants’ motion to stay pending ex parte reexamination even though the case had already previously been stayed pending inter partes review. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Grupo Mexico SAB de CV v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:28 pm
Allergan and Forest Labs, Case No. 16-cv-09 (E.D. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 5:46 am
In denying defendant's motion to stay pending ex parte reexamination, the court concluded that reexamination statistics weighed against a stay. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:45 am
Does 1-22, 1:08-cv-00066-S-DLM (D. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
Under the statute, however, ex parte interviews are not unlimited. [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:15 am
The court denied defendants' motion to stay pending ex parte and inter partes reexamination of the four patents-in-suit because the potential for simplification did not favor a stay. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
Under the statute, however, ex parte interviews are not unlimited. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm
John Doe, 14-cv-20216; Magistrate Frank Lynch also denied Lipscomb’s motion for ex-parte discovery citing untimely copyright registrations in Malibu Media v. [read post]