Search for: "Ex Parte Clear"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,075
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
”)[1] Mainstream press reports have focused primarily on the “net neutrality” part of the Order, and to be sure, the FCC’s desire to implement the Open Internet rules catalyzed the overall effort. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
— The court bifurcated its analysis into two parts: Twitter’s claims related to allegedly improper access to its systems and its claims regarding allegedly improper selling of scraped data. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:53 am
It’s a core part of due process — the guarantee that you have the right to understand the charges against you, to confront your accusers, and to mount a defense. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm
Update 5/9/2024: We received a report of another scam. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
No. 26 v Pico, 457 US 853, 872 [1982]).A board’s decision to retain a challenged book or other library material in its collection will only be reversed if the board has acted in an arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable manner (Appeal of Bradshaw, 62 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,197).[3] In an appeal to the Commissioner, a petitioner has the burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested and establishing the facts upon which he or she seeks relief (8 NYCRR… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
No. 26 v Pico, 457 US 853, 872 [1982]).A board’s decision to retain a challenged book or other library material in its collection will only be reversed if the board has acted in an arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable manner (Appeal of Bradshaw, 62 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,197).[3] In an appeal to the Commissioner, a petitioner has the burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested and establishing the facts upon which he or she seeks relief (8 NYCRR… [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
Note: Ex. 7 at U78; Hearing Tr. at 39 (Department witness testified that “LWA is not an unemployment benefit. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
It is not yet clear if this part of the investigation builds upon the Election Guidance in any way. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 4:53 am
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS The Supreme Court yesterday denied ex-Trump White House adviser Peter Navarro’s bid to stay out of prison while appealing [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
But we think the relevant perspective should be ex ante, not ex post, even as ex post data in a given scenario might in some small way be probative of ex ante risk A student should not escape punishment simply because disruption does not take place even though it was likely to occur; the school need not wait until actual disruption arises, and should be free to prevent disruption from occurring in the first place. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
I devote Part II of my brief to this issue. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 12:16 pm
Ex: “He promised me a yacht so I spent a thousand dollars on sailing lessons. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
On March 26, 2024, the court granted, in substantial part, DANY’s request to restrict Trump’s prejudicial extrajudicial statements. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:15 am
State ex rel. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
The historic importance of this case is clear. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The key to navigating this distinction is not “whether making official announcements could fit within the job description; but whether making official announcements is actually part of the job that the State entrusted the official to do. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
What the amendment says When I went on the podcast I assumed that Harriet Harman had planned to amend part 1 of the Children Act 1989, which is where parental responsibility is defined and the framework for it being granted and removed is set out. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Attorneys for Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira argued the charges against them should be dismissed, in part, because the indictment accused them of obstructing officials’ efforts to retrieve classified materials from Trump’s property without providing clear evidence the employees were aware of an ongoing investigation or knew the boxes of documents contained classified materials. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
" An ex parte order granted that motion. [read post]
