Search for: "Ex Parte State"
Results 21 - 40
of 12,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 10:30 pm
To insulate the status quo from change is to perpetuate the injustices befalling many of the underrepresented parts of the society. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
And, it is placed within a section [Article I, § 9] of other such limitations [such as] “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed”) and “No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State, [to be contrasted with Article I, § 8, which provides that] ”“The Congress shall have Power To . . . [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:56 pm
Commissioner Christie strongly opposed this backstop cost allocation method in the open meeting adopting the Final Rule, and voted against adoption of the Final Rule in large part due to this requirement as discussed in his dissent. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:06 am
Klasfeld’s reporting is part of Just Security’s Trump Trials Clearinghouse. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:00 am
He stated that this was due to threats against himself, his wife, and his kids. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:37 pm
” The government made an ex parte submission, and the district court dismissed for lack of standing. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
We're just saying that if, hypothetically, the government's ex parte submission showed the plaintiffs weren't on a terrorist watch list when they filed this lawsuit, they wouldn't have standing. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
Federal Prosecutors Reissue Criminal Charges Against Ex-Rep. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:02 am
Peter C. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm
There is no shortage of artists in all genres taking aims at rivals or exes — just look at Taylor Swift’s latest offering. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
State and Local Preemption. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Mini-trials on the transportation-industry issue could become a regular, slow, and expensive practice in FAA cases. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
— The court bifurcated its analysis into two parts: Twitter’s claims related to allegedly improper access to its systems and its claims regarding allegedly improper selling of scraped data. [read post]
