Search for: "Ex Parte State Ex Rel. State of Ohio" Results 21 - 40 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am by Dan Lopez
Should my valuation, the potential likelihood of enforcement action against my deal, would it be different ex-post as opposed to ex-ante when these guidelines are finalized? [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
While many of these GOP lawmakers have cast votes this year to limit abortion access – maintaining a stance that some Republicans concede hurt their party in last year’s midterm elections – others spent part of the congressional recess talking up their support for birth control access, which is broadly popular across the country and across party lines. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
To remove a case on a “color of office” argument, the removing party bears the burden of establishing what’s called the three-part “Mesa test,” from the Supreme Court case by that name,[5] The three-part test requires the defendant to show they: were an “officer, or any person acting under that officer, of the United States” are facing criminal charges “for or relating to any act under color of such office”; and have… [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
They have already played a pivotal role in turning several red states blue and they could play an equally decisive role in key swing states next year. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
GOP States Quit the Program That Fights Voter Fraud. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Mallory had worked for Norfolk Southern only in Ohio and Virginia, and his complaint alleged exposure to carcinogens only in Ohio and Virginia. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Doug Ducey to overturn the state’s presidential election results, saying if enough fraudulent votes could be found it would overcome Trump’s narrow loss in the state. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Many other courts have done much the same, both in state[18] and in federal courts,[19] and both before and after the Supreme Court decided Daubert, and even after Rule 702 was amended in 2000.[20] Perhaps even more disturbing is that the current edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence glibly cites to the Wells case, for the dubious proposition that “Generally, researchers are conservative when it comes to assessing causal relationships, often calling for stronger… [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:37 pm by Jim Sedor
Seeking an inquiry, the ex-colleague has provided records to the Justice Department and Congress indicating Mrs. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Paul Smith of the Campaign Legal Center, which also defended the restrictions Cruz got overturned, drew a distinction between a senator taking donations that end up in his personal account and an ex-candidate tapping unspent campaign funds to repay an old loan. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Election officials said they believed the relative normalcy resulted from a combination of concerted effort on the part of well-prepared poll workers and voters, as well as that some of Trump’s loudest supporters were less potent than they had claimed. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
” In context, this word generally (as in Articles I and II) means a state’s lawmaking system—as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in a century-old line of cases from Ohio ex rel Davis v. [read post]