Search for: "Ex parte CAIN"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding is judicially… [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Citibank, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, which also sits in Houston and lords over the same trial courts in ten surrounding counties, did not merely hold that use of credit card and payments to account demonstrated existence of contract (thus ruling against the Defendant on that issue), but also reversed the judgment in part because the bank had not adduced any evidence of what the variable interest rate was at the relevant time (thereby sustaining one of the Defendant’s complaints… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
- http://nyti.ms/LGf2kV (Quentin Hardy, Claire Cain Miller) How Many Requests for User Information is Twitter Receiving? [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
-taxpayer-controlled foreign corporation’s “accumulated post-1986 deferred foreign income” as part of the corporation’s taxable income during 2017. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm
I also reviewed all of ACOG’s own statements on the issue, as well as the rulings and the available parts of the record in the Gonzales v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Cain, No. 07-30709 In a collateral proceeding in a murder case, grant of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) petitioner adequately exhausted his claims in state court; 2) the admission of hearsay testimony at his trial was erroneous; and 3) the state court's holding that the error was harmless was contrary to, and an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
House passed legislation that supporters said would restore key parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act the Supreme Court struck down in 2013. [read post]
