Search for: "Ex parte K. S. C."
Results 21 - 40
of 294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Campaign operatives said annoying voters is simply part of the job. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:50 am
§ 1396r-8(b)(3)(C)(i). [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:46 pm
The business-operating ex-spouse is now the trustee for the other ex-spouse’s portion of the business….and that means the business-operating spouse has special duties to their ex-spouse. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The benefit of the additional ex postdisclosures proposed by the SEC are negated by the absence of such ex ante disclosures as the issuer may benefit from trading on the basis of its own knowledge of its proposed program or trading arrangement, thereby profiting from the subsequent increase in share price following the ex post disclosures of the transactions. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff’s mother, Tillie, died. 1946-02. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:33 pm
Rev. 1087 (2022) by ANUJ C. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am
Courts will rarely, if ever award portions of a business to both spouses…where the now-ex-spouses must work together. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
Kelly said Trump’s demands were part of a broader pattern of him trying to use the Justice Department and his authority as president against people who had been critical of him. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
This norm is part of procedural law. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
C., 82 AD3d 652, 652 [1st Dept 2011] [granting dismissal where the complaint failed to plead that the attorneys’ actions caused the plaintiff’s damages]). [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:45 am
The panel members have grappled with these issues as part of a unique national ethics consultation service responding to dilemmas of clinicians and agencies involved in the practice of MAID. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:46 am
[But a c]ontemplation or foreseeability of future events shall not be considered as a factor or used as a defense in determining whether a substantial change in circumstances is shown, unless the future event is expressly specified in the court’s order or the agreement of the parties incorporated into a court order. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
[But a c]ontemplation or foreseeability of future events shall not be considered as a factor or used as a defense in determining whether a substantial change in circumstances is shown, unless the future event is expressly specified in the court’s order or the agreement of the parties incorporated into a court order. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am
Here’s How. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am
C. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 2:50 pm
"] From yesterday's pseudonymized decision in Kareem K. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 2:22 pm
” So, virtually any 4 crypto-currency purchases, sales or trades will trigger a 1099-K in Illinois and the cryptocurrency holder will have those 1099-K as part of their standard tax packet. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:42 pm
3.5 La période à prendre en considération s'étend sur les cinq années quiprécèdent l'invocation du défaut d'usage (par analogie : IPI, Directives en matière de marques [https://www.ige.ch/fr/prestations/documents-et-liens/marques.html, consultées le 13 juillet 2021], version du 1er janvier2019, Partie 6, ch. 5.3.2 [p. 244] ; CHRISTOPH GASSER, in :… [read post]
