Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 30,259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2024, 6:59 am
The cases are State of Louisiana v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Statute stating that “any judgment . . . shall . . . bear post-judgment interest” requires interest on entire judgment, including any portion consisting of pre-judgment interest. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:29 am
That was the issue before the Connecticut Appellate Court in Demarco v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
In State of Louisiana v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:38 pm
This issue arose in the Adams v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 1:09 pm
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:57 am
In the Maryland case of Wolff v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Two cases were filed in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas, State of Texas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Law Firm Rates Tracker (Debtor Professionals Mega Bankruptcies) Debtor Professionals Mega Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
Supreme Court Hands a Blow to Small-Business Succession Planning in Connelly v. U.S., by Sam Sturgis
17 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm
On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court held in Connelly v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:20 am
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
(SFFA) v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:02 am
In this sense, decisions like those of the US Copyright Office in Zarya of the Dawn [IPKat here] and the Beijing Internet Court in Li v Liu [IPKat here] are helpful. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
Fair enough. [read post]
