Search for: "FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 7:50 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco, declining to exercise Chevron deference when a regulation involves an issue of exceptional importance. 2001. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
AT & T Corp., ___ A.3d ___, 2011 WL 165843, at *20 (D.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:27 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000) ("If Congress has done so, the inquiry is at an end; the court must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:43 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, where the MQD operates as a “carveout from Chevron deference. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 6:52 am
Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp., a key case in the doctrine’s lineage that rejected the FDA’s effort to regulate tobacco, the Court took into account not only the tobacco industry’s importance, but also the novelty of the FDA proposal and its incompatibility with the statutory scheme and other legislation—all of which suggested that Congress had not actually granted the FDA the broad power it… [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133–35 (2000). [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:37 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159–60 (2000). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:33 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 160 (2000). [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 1999 WL 980159, at *1 (E.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Brown & Williamson Corp.. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:22 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:44 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., for example, the Supreme Court stated that “given the economic and political significance of the tobacco industry” it was “extremely unlikely” that Congress intended to give the FDA the authority to ban tobacco products. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:53 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
In American Library Association v. [read post]