Search for: "FEDERAL MARINE TERMINALS, INC." Results 21 - 40 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm by Amanda Pickens
Ceres Marine Terminals Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00192 (D.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm by David Wright
Ceres Marine Terminals Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00192 (D.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:43 pm by Micah Belden
Marine Terminals, Inc., 647 F.3d 1116, 1121 (11th Cir.2011) (“The essence of the common law’s test for whether an agent is an employee or an independent contractor is the control of details; that is, whether the principal has the right to control the manner and means by which the agent accomplishes the work. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:43 pm by Micah Belden
Marine Terminals, Inc., 647 F.3d 1116, 1121 (11th Cir.2011) (“The essence of the common law’s test for whether an agent is an employee or an independent contractor is the control of details; that is, whether the principal has the right to control the manner and means by which the agent accomplishes the work. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:43 pm by Micah Belden
Marine Terminals, Inc., 647 F.3d 1116, 1121 (11th Cir.2011) (“The essence of the common law’s test for whether an agent is an employee or an independent contractor is the control of details; that is, whether the principal has the right to control the manner and means by which the agent accomplishes the work. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:14 am by Steven Koprince
Bryan Concrete & Excavation, Inc., CBCA 2882, 2016 WL 4533096 involved a U.S Marine Corps veteran with a 100% disability rating, Jerry Bryan. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:12 am by Steven Boutwell
Since its initial enactment, Congress amended the Act in 1972 to expand the geographic scope of coverage for the LHWCA shoreside – covering maritime employees (non-seaman workers) injured not only on navigable waters, but also on “any adjoining pier, wharf, dry dock, terminal, building way, marine railway, or other adjoining area customarily used by an employer in loading, unloading, repairing, dismantling, or building a vessel. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:12 am by Steven Boutwell
Since its initial enactment, Congress amended the Act in 1972 to expand the geographic scope of coverage for the LHWCA shoreside – covering maritime employees (non-seaman workers) injured not only on navigable waters, but also on “any adjoining pier, wharf, dry dock, terminal, building way, marine railway, or other adjoining area customarily used by an employer in loading, unloading, repairing, dismantling, or building a vessel. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 11:35 am by Justin A
Mar. 22, 2016).I thought this was an interesting case to cite because it also involves an injury occurring at an Alaska marine terminal. [read post]