Search for: "FLOWERS v. FLOWERS"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2024, 3:50 am
The recent decision of the Munich Local Division in SES v Hanshow seemed to go in an odd direction by using the application as filed and prosecution history in the claim interpretation.Rose Hughes also speculated on the potential referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal to consider how much the description should be taken into account for claim interpretation, given the confusing and contradictory case law on this important question. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
Reyes v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
On Valentine’s Day, in lieu of chocolates and flowers, USCIS gave us the best gift of all and issued updated guidance implementing this long-awaited change. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:56 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Corp. v S. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
The editors' chapter entitled 'Artificial Flowers' contrasts the different ways patent law and copyright law dealt with the unruly and changeable nature of living subject matter by analysing how courts have dealt with copyright claims to artificial flowers.Theme 4: Nature as Subject MatterThe final two chapters discuss how IP law has consistently been faced with the challenges of dealing with nature-based subject matter. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
(Tribal Taxation) Merit Energy Operations I, LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm
I guess we’ll know more when the flowers start to bloom in the spring. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
Canales v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
The case of McIntyre v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The key case on this is NAACP v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
” Flowers Foods had argued that there is no split in the circuits, that the Supreme Court in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm
In a 1984 decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:07 am
Number Word Mark 7140222 MINLEARN 7151067 CHOCORITE 7151059 HIGHWAY 61 7151041 ZOTTA 7151040 JALAPERS 7151039 WUNDERKRAUT 7150973 MELTEEZA 7152599 MARIBEN 7150458 O-V-R 7150398 HISOL 7150355 I AM THEM 7150128 LOVE FOR MALAWI 7149881 FAITHFUL WARRIORS 7149433 THE VAHA COLLECTION 7149350 GROUND MAN 7149136 CHRISTIAN SLAY 7149111 THE TRUST COMPANY OF OXFORD 7148960 BLOOMINGFOODS 7152528 FREIGHTMATH 7148847 TRUCKSAFE 7148625 FORWARD HUSTLE APPAREL 7148624 7148623 BLUE FOX 7152434 MODEL G… [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
Flowers, and University of Baltimore School of Law Professor José F. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 11:11 am
The leading case on this subject in Pennsylvania is Hanrahan v. [read post]
