Search for: "FOR SALE BY OWNER V. VILLAGE"
Results 21 - 40
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2007, 12:25 am
It is being reported that the government has asked SCOTUS to review the Sixth Circuit decision in Pagan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 12:25 am
It is being reported that the government has asked SCOTUS to review the Sixth Circuit decision in Pagan v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:51 am
The County’s appraisal was also based on a comparable sales methodology, but it analyzed four recent sales of vacant land located outside the Village limits. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
Supreme Court's controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v New London (545 US 469) greatly expanded the government's power of eminent domain by holding that the government could transfer land from one private owner to another to further economic development. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 9:55 am
Recently, the Colorado Court of Appeals opinion in Brooktree Village Homeowners Association v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 4:08 am
Miller v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 10:11 pm
Board of Trustees of the Village of Forest View, No. 115130 -- Issue Presented: When a business' operations span multiple counties, where does a retail sale tax place for purposes of the local portion of the state sales tax? [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:49 am
Background: At one time, the list of who could file a tax complaint was limited to attorneys and individual property owners, as a result of then current court precedent, most notably, Sharon Village Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:30 pm
The defendants, RM and KM, are the owners in fee of a residential home located at 88 Liberty Boulevard, within the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, also known on the tax map of the County of Nassau as Section 37, Block 400, Lots 39 and 40. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:11 pm
Palm Bch. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:49 am
Planning Board of the Village of Woodbury, the petitioner had purchased two lots in a tax sale, with the only notation on the filed subdivision map being " not approved for building lots." [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:49 am
Planning Board of the Village of Woodbury, the petitioner had purchased two lots in a tax sale, with the only notation on the filed subdivision map being " not approved for building lots. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Majority owners of closely held companies have the squeeze out. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Background: At one time, the list of who could file a tax complaint was limited to attorneys and individual property owners, as a result of then current court precedent, most notably, Sharon Village Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:08 am
Schneider v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:31 am
Simon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
Outside Sales Exemption. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 12:21 am
However, our decision in Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:31 am
Village Green Realty, decided on June 2. [read post]
