Search for: "FRENCH V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2018, 12:12 pm
The absence of a universal system of dispute settlement enables us to take on board regional specificities and appropriately to take into account the positions of the states that entered into investment agreements. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
The opponents (Os), in particular 04 in its letter of 29.12.2017，argued against a separate appealable decision on legal entitlement to priority since this would delay even further a decision on the merits of the case and by consequence decisions in the co-pending patents and would extend the legal uncertainty for the public. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Several of these concerns have merit, and are considered in this paper. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 7:19 am
The Board’s rulings are and will continue to be challenged, but there is an established system to address appeals. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Lee, 15-446, presenting two questions about review of decisions rendered by the Patent and Trial Appeal Board; Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am
Legal System, 2nd Edition, by Curtis A. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
That systemicity (cf. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:58 pm
Shemo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
Italy 2011, Povse v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 10:22 pm
Ashby Donald and othrs. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The European Court declared the application admissible and not manifestly ill-founded ([25]), but concluded on the merits of the case that the conviction of the applicants because of breach of the French Copyright Act did not amount to a violation of Article 10 of the Convention by the French authorities. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
Roche Molecular Systems. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In fact the Employee Polygraph Protection Act, 1998 was designed to restrict their use for employee screening. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
., focuses on the role of the US federal system. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Neither is the court entitled to dispute the correctness of a particular religious belief, though it may ask whether it is sincerely held (Thomas v Review Board). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
R. v. [read post]
