Search for: "Fair et al v. Fred" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for European… [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And relying on the defense that, by current standards, Sanders et al. are literally as far left as US politics goes simply misses the import of words. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
PIONEER MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et. al, The Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act affords certain protections to elders and dependent adults. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The Committee typically met 2-4 times yearly and was apparently content, until the pandemic struck, to continue in place with rules dating from the Victorian era (though in fairness to Committee Members and per Justice Brown, six ‘tweaks’ had been made since 1881[29]). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Some people may possess a sense of fairness that opposes disproportionately high taxes on them as a matter of principle, but for most, what matters more is how it affects the broader public: what it does for the Commonwealth’s economy, understood in terms of jobs, growth, opportunity, and income-earning potential for individuals who will never join the rarified company of those actually remitting under the proposed surtax. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]