Search for: "Faith A. Bartlett"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2017, 10:56 am
(As largely faith-based groups, the volags are also subject to a higher authority, but I won’t dwell on that here.) [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
De Grandy and Bartlett v. [read post]
Unconstitutional to Consider Husband’s Refusal to Give Religious Divorce (Get) When Granting Support
29 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Bartlett in the January 13, 2017 decision in Masri v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
The Court found that “even if these facts could be considered evidence of malice,” the trial court judge had found that the plaintiff had a good faith belief in the right of first refusal, the claim had survived summary judgment, and a jury (although ruling against them on the question of whether they had an easement) found that they had a good reason to believe the cut down tree was on their own property (nothing about the cameras or dirt pile, though). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
The Court found that “even if these facts could be considered evidence of malice,” the trial court judge had found that the plaintiff had a good faith belief in the right of first refusal, the claim had survived summary judgment, and a jury (although ruling against them on the question of whether they had an easement) found that they had a good reason to believe the cut down tree was on their own property (nothing about the cameras or dirt pile, though). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
The Court found that “even if these facts could be considered evidence of malice,” the trial court judge had found that the plaintiff had a good faith belief in the right of first refusal, the claim had survived summary judgment, and a jury (although ruling against them on the question of whether they had an easement) found that they had a good reason to believe the cut down tree was on their own property (nothing about the cameras or dirt pile, though). [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
As an administration official quoted in the Washington Post put it: "We strongly believe that terrorists picked up off the battlefield—who don't represent a nation, revel in killing the innocent, and refuse to wear uniforms—do not qualify for protections under Geneva," White House counselor Dan Bartlett said. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 6:03 am
Harris, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, on Monday, July 25, 2016 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Corporate forms, Corporate governance, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative actions, Derivative suits, Duty of good faith, Liability standards, Management How Do Investors Accumulate Network Capital? [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Monday also saw the issuance of orders granting the petition, vacating the judgment, and remanding (“GVRs”) that (as your faithful correspondents predicted in noncommittal fashion) occasioned separate writings. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:07 am
Kess, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, January 23, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Accounting, Accounting standards, Audit committee, Audits, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Disclosure, Engagement, External auditors, PCAOB, SEC, Securities Regulation, Transparency Calculating SEC Civil Money Penalties Posted by Jonathan N. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:06 am
Bartlett A few days ago I listened to Ted Cruz talk about the difference between Islamism and the Islamic faith, and “carpet bombing” in response to ISIS. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:15 am
"A plague on both your houses" is my preferred stance, reflecting that I understand the imperatives of politics will lead people (even when of good faith) away from being able to consider consistently adopting analyses or policies based purely on their actual merits.But my distress over the turn Republicans have often taken since 1994 (although I didn't really get distressed about it until about 2002) risks leading me into rants if I pay too close attention to daily… [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:30 am
Or is it a leap of faith, inspired by the “no possibility” standard’s requirement that if any interpretation or mutilation of the law might keep the non-diverse defendant in, then the federal court can push the remand button with a clean conscience and a slightly lighter docket? [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am
Kerns, Protecting the Faithful from Their Faith: A Proposal for Snake-Handling Law in West Virginia, (West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 116, p. 561, 2014).Robert P. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
It’s also a point that Judge Edwards made in his opinion respecting the denial of en banc review in Bartlett v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 4:31 am
UPDATE: Bruce Bartlett makes the case that hitting the debt limit is a big deal even if prioritization is possible. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
The Fifth Circuit simply presumed that the school acted in good faith and gave the plaintiff the burden of rebutting that presumption. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
Therefore, we instruct lower courts to address, on the merits, all issues raised in good faith. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 10:27 am
It is evidence of bad faith. [read post]
